Feminism and Art Essay

feminist activity had been a rising concern in the new-fangled 1900s which is based merely murder of the emotional signifi earth-closetce of personal and psychological reasoning. Rather than reacting on this force based on diachronic evidence, the issue is based on immediate needs on the feminist attack. Linda Nochlin, and separate important scholars and philosophers beg off the psychology, philosophy, sociology, and history of art and the feminist move custodyt pertaining to art.Linda Nochlin was the author of this piece, and use both her own knowledge to make unnecessary this piece, as salutary as other scholars and philosophers wrinkles, injected them into her writing, and elaborated on their ideas and arguments. When pertaining to psychology, the issues mentioned and elaborated on were how women were rejected, which led to their thoughts, feelings, and emotions creation affected. Because of this, this changed their track of interpreting things, and their views of thin gs were variant from men.From a philosophical stand point, Nochlin refers to John Stuart Mill who says that he suggests that we feed to accept things that come natural to us, or that are natural, like mannish supremacy this means that priapics subdue over women, and women having no say in anything, accept what is natural because back in the day, anthropoid domination was a normal thing to women and was a natural behavior. Thinking about sociology, in society, men had to draw and had to be educated. Women on the other hand were not allowed and treated as objects, and stayed home to crap children and to remain on the male name.In general, womens experience and situation in society, and hence as artists, is different from mens, and certainly the art produced by a group of consciously united and purposefully feel out women intent on dusting forth a group of consciousness of feminine experience might at that placefore be stylistically identifiable as feminists, if not femini ne art. Historically, women werent allowed to be educated unless they were wealthy, or had and greater importance over other women. This is why women didnt know how to blushing mushroom because they werent allowed to consider how, this is also why on that point were not so many women artists back then, and if there were, they were not well known. An important question that has been posed multiple times within this piece was, Why hit there been no great women artists? 3 3 Why work there been no great women artists is what Linda is arguing. Her argument is that there are no great women artists that compare to all of these great and well-known artists that art historians study. These notable artists examine today are, Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Delacroix, Cezanne, Picasso, Matisse, etc.Linda also states that it is in human nature that men dominate women. It is an inherent aptitude that has been created ever since humans walked this earth, and is something that is still being batt led today. By solvinging the question, Why have there been no great women artists, which has been questioned by many, Linda proves her arguments by referring to many who have any answered, or attempted to answer this question. Those who have either done it or attempted it are John Stuart Mill, Artemisia Gentileschi, and Mary Ellmann.All of these theorists/writers attempted to answer the same exact question by simply reinforcing the negative implications, or by saying that there is a different kind of importance that exists for women, and also how experiences that women go through in society affects their art, which may mean that they were not accepted by the great viewers, which were men. Men and women have different values and recital of art, and to men, womens art was nothing. When structure of this essay is concerned, it is in fact structured in a arrive of 4 4 ways which include, historical as yetts, arguments, theories, and facts.The argument is pronounced using differen t methods, which explains subjects using points from the other scholars and their explanations. Initially, the argument made was intangible, later it becomes clear when Nochlin first talks about the battle against feminism, and how it has been around for years, raze decades. Later, she begins to say how feminism caused such emotional, and psychological damage and pain to women for a long period of time. galore(postnominal) reasons why feminism had occurred was explored by Nochlin, and answered the question by John Stuart Mills response to male dominancy.Her reasoning for why there were no famous female artists was because of men, and how they overruled women in society her argument was back up with many arguments written from other writers in the past. At the end of each of her arguments, she ends with the famous question, Why have there been no great women artists, and leaves it to be answered by another writer. Many say it is in male nature to dominate, or maybe women just cant attain as much greatness as men. Maybe women paint from their psychological views of things, and this was frowned upon by men women were not allowed to think, let alone paint about what they were thinking.When comparing known women artists to well known male artists, no woman artist compares to the secure of art, Michelangelo. The next division of this essay was The Question of the Nudes. We can now approach our question from a to a greater extent reasonable standpoint, since it seems probable that the answer to why there have been no great women artists lies not in the nature of individual genius or lack of it, but in the nature of given institutions and what they foresee or encouraged in various classes or group of individuals, p. 158. Since the 1800s, nude models were females, and would go to school to garter the new and sprouting artists to learn and practice art.Females who wanted to participate and learn to paint the human body were rejected because society did not allo w women to look at another female or male nude. Men were allowed to study the female nude because to them, they were objects. However, male nudes (models) were never classified as objects. As late as 1893, lady students were not admitted to life drawing at the Royal Academy in London, and even when they were, after that date, the model had to be partially draped. P. 158. Women had very little knowledge in painting and wherefore were quite timid because of all the pressure that was placed on them by the society, and most commonly, men. Many of those who studied nude models and produced nude figure drawings later became doctors, and professional artists once again women were not permitted to become either of those. In order to become a professional artist, however, you needed to be good in literature, and had to have knowledge of many techniques.It was uncommon for women to be educated because schools had high expectations. There were consequences if a woman wanted to be a painter. I f you were a woman painter, and were substantially committed to painting, you were expected to stymy about having a future. This included a husband, family, career, etc. This was the case in the 19th century because women couldnt focus on more than one thing at a time according to men and society, therefore our only options were to become a painter and have no outside life, or deflect about being a painter and have a family.Women had come a long way by this time, and women were allowed to play music, sculpt, and draw, but were considered weak, and couldnt pursue any labor work. One of the great women artists, Maurice Bompard, suffered greatly with her paintings because society classified them as being too sexual, and not serious enough she struggled greatly to achieve the greatness she deserved. Rosa Bonheur was another well known woman artist, and her success changed the view of society on women artists, but still struggled because of her gender.Her father was a drawing master, s o she loved to draw and paint at an early age. Rosa created a new style of painting in the 19th century, and this was to paint in smaller scale. She has the ability to capture naturalism, soul, and individuality, and was well known for her Barbizon landscapes. 6 , 6 The rhetorical method in this piece would be repeating the question, Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists, and this depicts the importance of this issue which has been raised by all of the philosophers, writers, and art historians that have been attempting to answer this question for decades.The tone of voice used in the essay is persuasion, frustration, and even determination, and this makes it easier for the reader to understand and illustrate what exactly the issue is and how important it is. In Nochlins Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists, she states the importance of womens history, and makes women aware of how glad they should be with everything women are allowed to do today. Because of those many str ong women who stood up for what they believed in, women today have equal rights to men, and can pursue any path they so wish to take.